Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs JFNNX
FSPHX vs JFNNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. JFNNX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and JFNNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. JFNNX (4.49B). JFNNX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: JFNNX (0.48) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than JFNNX: FSPHX (44 years) vs JFNNX (8 years). JFNNX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. JFNNX (35.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFNNX: FSPHX (0) vs JFNNX (1000000). JFNNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.32 vs. FSPHX (-15.25). JFNNX return over 5 years is better than : 8.76 vs. FSPHX (-13.73).
| FSPHX | JFNNX | FSPHX / JFNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.68 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.68 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.202 | 3.263 | -67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.88B | 4.49B | 131% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.48 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.25 | -12.32 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.92 | 21.61 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.73 | 8.76 | -157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement