Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs JFNSX
FSPHX vs JFNSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. JFNSX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and JFNSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.2B vs. JFNSX (4.66B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than JFNSX: FSPHX (0.02) vs JFNSX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than JFNSX: FSPHX (44 years) vs JFNSX (16 years). JFNSX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. JFNSX (35.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFNSX: FSPHX (0) vs JFNSX (2500). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.07 vs. JFNSX (-14.62). JFNSX return over 5 years is better than : 4.14 vs. FSPHX (-12.51).
| FSPHX | JFNSX | FSPHX / JFNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.789 | -5.776 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.2B | 4.66B | 133% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.07 | -14.62 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.05 | 5.24 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.51 | 4.14 | -303% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.47 | 1.62 | 400% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers