Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCFX
FSPHX vs LHCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. LHCFX (8.85M). LHCFX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCFX (0.41) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCFX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCFX (6 years). LHCFX (3.19) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.48 vs. FSPHX (0.02). LHCFX return over 5 years is better than : 10.72 vs. FSPHX (-8.84).
| FSPHX | LHCFX | FSPHX / LHCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.78 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.19 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.532 | 17.629 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 8.85M | 70,229% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.41 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | 14.48 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.47 | 33.01 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.84 | 10.72 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement