Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs LHCFX
FSPHX vs LHCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCFX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. LHCFX (7.48M). LHCFX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCFX (0.48) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCFX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCFX (6 years). LHCFX (3.38) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). LHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.45 vs. FSPHX (-9.61). LHCFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.42 vs. FSPHX (10.17).
| FSPHX | LHCFX | FSPHX / LHCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.78 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 3.38 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.064 | -5.052 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 7.48M | 85,751% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.48 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.61 | -3.45 | 278% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.12 | -1.02 | 991% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.17 | 32.42 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...