Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCFX
FSPHX vs LHCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCFX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. LHCFX (8.12M). LHCFX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCFX (0.43) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCFX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCFX (6 years). LHCFX (3.19) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.84 vs. FSPHX (-10.18). LHCFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.09 vs. FSPHX (-14.11).
| FSPHX | LHCFX | FSPHX / LHCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.78 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.19 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.110 | 7.887 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 8.12M | 73,430% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.43 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.18 | 1.84 | -553% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.43 | 29.99 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.11 | 2.09 | -676% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement