Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCQX
FSPHX vs LHCQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCQX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. LHCQX (8.81M). LHCQX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCQX (0.31) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCQX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCQX (6 years). LHCQX (3.59) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.13 vs. FSPHX (0.35). LHCQX return over 5 years is better than : 7.82 vs. FSPHX (-8.45).
| FSPHX | LHCQX | FSPHX / LHCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.28 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.59 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.569 | 16.578 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 8.81M | 70,564% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.31 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.35 | 15.13 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.51 | 30.50 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.45 | 7.82 | -108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement