Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs LHCQX
FSPHX vs LHCQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCQX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. LHCQX (7.12M). LHCQX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCQX (0.36) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCQX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCQX (6 years). LHCQX (3.78) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). LHCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.85 vs. FSPHX (-11.94). LHCQX return over 5 years is better than : 5.51 vs. FSPHX (-11.25).
| FSPHX | LHCQX | FSPHX / LHCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.28 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 3.78 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.367 | -9.534 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 7.12M | 90,162% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.36 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.94 | -5.85 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.28 | -0.43 | 1,911% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.25 | 5.51 | -204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers