Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCQX
FSPHX vs LHCQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCQX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.92B vs. LHCQX (7.21M). LHCQX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCQX (0.36) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCQX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCQX (6 years). LHCQX (3.59) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.48 vs. FSPHX (-15.89). LHCQX return over 5 years is better than : -2.14 vs. FSPHX (-18.69).
| FSPHX | LHCQX | FSPHX / LHCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.28 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.59 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.312 | -5.456 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.92B | 7.21M | 82,104% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.36 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.89 | -11.48 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.14 | 6.91 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.69 | -2.14 | 872% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement