Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs PDFDX
FSPHX vs PDFDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PDFDX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and PDFDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. PDFDX (6.03M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than PDFDX: FSPHX (0.02) vs PDFDX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PDFDX: FSPHX (44 years) vs PDFDX (27 years). PDFDX (4.48) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. PDFDX (0.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDFDX: FSPHX (0) vs PDFDX (2500). PDFDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.77 vs. FSPHX (-12.67). PDFDX return over 5 years is better than : -12.04 vs. FSPHX (-13.93).
| FSPHX | PDFDX | FSPHX / PDFDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.50 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 4.48 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.266 | -13.849 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 6.03M | 97,295% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.67 | 6.77 | -187% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.50 | 3.92 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.93 | -12.04 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.04 | 25.39 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement