Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs PDFDX
FSPHX vs PDFDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PDFDX commentary
Apr 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and PDFDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. PDFDX (5.71M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than PDFDX: FSPHX (0.02) vs PDFDX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PDFDX: FSPHX (44 years) vs PDFDX (27 years). PDFDX (4.48) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. PDFDX (0.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDFDX: FSPHX (0) vs PDFDX (2500). PDFDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.53 vs. FSPHX (-14.91). PDFDX return over 5 years is better than : 15.59 vs. FSPHX (2.74).
| FSPHX | PDFDX | FSPHX / PDFDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.50 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 4.48 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.743 | -22.139 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 5.71M | 112,445% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.91 | -6.53 | 228% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.76 | -21.40 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.74 | 15.59 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.19 | 7.40 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...