Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs PDFDX
FSPHX vs PDFDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PDFDX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and PDFDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. PDFDX (6.67M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than PDFDX: FSPHX (0.02) vs PDFDX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PDFDX: FSPHX (44 years) vs PDFDX (28 years). PDFDX (4.69) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. PDFDX (10.08). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDFDX: FSPHX (0) vs PDFDX (2500). PDFDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.77 vs. FSPHX (-10.28). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -15.42 vs. PDFDX (-16.23).
| FSPHX | PDFDX | FSPHX / PDFDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.50 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 4.69 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.229 | 1.231 | 262% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 6.67M | 89,362% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.28 | 12.77 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.94 | 33.78 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.42 | -16.23 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.98 | 66.23 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers