Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs PDFDX
FSPHX vs PDFDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PDFDX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and PDFDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. PDFDX (5.84M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than PDFDX: FSPHX (0.02) vs PDFDX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PDFDX: FSPHX (44 years) vs PDFDX (27 years). PDFDX (4.48) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. PDFDX (10.08). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDFDX: FSPHX (0) vs PDFDX (2500). PDFDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.95 vs. FSPHX (-13.02). PDFDX return over 5 years is better than : -16.30 vs. FSPHX (-19.49).
| FSPHX | PDFDX | FSPHX / PDFDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.50 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 4.48 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.670 | -12.175 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.74B | 5.84M | 98,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.02 | 8.95 | -145% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.77 | -4.14 | 260% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.49 | -16.30 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.32 | 26.80 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers