Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs PDFDX
FSPHX vs PDFDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PDFDX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and PDFDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. PDFDX (6.58M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than PDFDX: FSPHX (0.02) vs PDFDX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PDFDX: FSPHX (44 years) vs PDFDX (27 years). PDFDX (4.69) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. PDFDX (10.08). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDFDX: FSPHX (0) vs PDFDX (2500). PDFDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.63 vs. FSPHX (-16.81). PDFDX return over 5 years is better than : -8.68 vs. FSPHX (-15.98).
| FSPHX | PDFDX | FSPHX / PDFDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.50 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 4.69 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.789 | 0.327 | -853% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.88B | 6.58M | 89,392% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.81 | 10.63 | -158% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.34 | 24.22 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.98 | -8.68 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.60 | 53.50 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement