Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs PGHAX
FSPHX vs PGHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PGHAX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and PGHAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. PGHAX (1.45B). PGHAX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: PGHAX (0.63) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PGHAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs PGHAX (5 years). PGHAX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. PGHAX (36.00). FSPHX (0) and PGHAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PGHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.71 vs. FSPHX (-16.27). PGHAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.49 vs. FSPHX (-15.70).
| FSPHX | PGHAX | FSPHX / PGHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.71 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.71 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.459 | 2.183 | -113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.88B | 1.45B | 406% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.63 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.27 | -14.71 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.51 | 5.84 | -43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.70 | 0.49 | -3,214% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement