Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs PHSZX
FSPHX vs PHSZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PHSZX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and PHSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. PHSZX (1.4B). PHSZX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: PHSZX (0.83) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PHSZX: FSPHX (44 years) vs PHSZX (26 years). PHSZX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). PHSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX (0) and PHSZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.80 vs. PHSZX (-14.59). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -10.01 vs. PHSZX (-18.50).
| FSPHX | PHSZX | FSPHX / PHSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.86 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.86 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.083 | -7.491 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 1.4B | 457% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.83 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.80 | -14.59 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.54 | -2.72 | 277% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.01 | -18.50 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.24 | -29.21 | -28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...