Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs RCGHX
FSPHX vs RCGHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RCGHX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RCGHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. RCGHX (106M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RCGHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RCGHX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RCGHX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RCGHX (23 years). RCGHX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RCGHX (6.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGHX: FSPHX (0) vs RCGHX (2500). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.66 vs. RCGHX (-14.40). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : 2.10 vs. RCGHX (-35.58).
| FSPHX | RCGHX | FSPHX / RCGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.14 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.14 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.413 | -6.269 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 106M | 6,052% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.66 | -14.40 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.23 | -28.44 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.10 | -35.58 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.27 | -52.61 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers