Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs RCGHX
FSPHX vs RCGHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RCGHX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and RCGHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 7.05B vs. RCGHX (120M). FSPHX (0.00) and RCGHX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSPHX was incepted earlier than RCGHX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RCGHX (23 years). RCGHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGHX: FSPHX (0) vs RCGHX (2500). RCGHX (-6.82) and FSPHX (-7.11) have marching annual gain over last year. FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -3.27 vs. RCGHX (-35.45).
| FSPHX | RCGHX | FSPHX / RCGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.697 | 3.538 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.05B | 120M | 5,878% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.11 | -6.82 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.60 | -13.35 | -34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.27 | -35.45 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.95 | -44.68 | -49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...