Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RCGHX
FSPHX vs RCGHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RCGHX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a StrongBuy and RCGHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. RCGHX (99.5M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RCGHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RCGHX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RCGHX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RCGHX (24 years). RCGHX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RCGHX (6.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGHX: FSPHX (0) vs RCGHX (2500). RCGHX (-14.62) and FSPHX (-14.90) have marching annual gain over last year. FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -14.48 vs. RCGHX (-42.40).
| FSPHX | RCGHX | FSPHX / RCGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.14 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.14 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.239 | -5.400 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.74B | 99.5M | 5,764% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.90 | -14.62 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.35 | -16.40 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.48 | -42.40 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.15 | -51.33 | -37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement