Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYHAX
FSPHX vs RYHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYHAX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and RYHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. RYHAX (19.5M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYHAX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYHAX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYHAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYHAX (27 years). RYHAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). RYHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 116.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYHAX: FSPHX (0) vs RYHAX (2500). RYHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.65 vs. FSPHX (-11.61). RYHAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.01 vs. FSPHX (-15.38).
| FSPHX | RYHAX | FSPHX / RYHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.65 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.68 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.183 | -2.273 | 360% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 19.5M | 30,067% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.61 | -4.65 | 249% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.13 | 4.91 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.38 | 7.01 | -219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.55 | -0.45 | -1,224% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement