Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYHAX
FSPHX vs RYHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYHAX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and RYHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.92B vs. RYHAX (19.4M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYHAX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYHAX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYHAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYHAX (27 years). RYHAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). RYHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 116.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYHAX: FSPHX (0) vs RYHAX (2500). RYHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.11 vs. FSPHX (-10.22). RYHAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.13 vs. FSPHX (-15.69).
| FSPHX | RYHAX | FSPHX / RYHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.65 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.68 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.055 | 0.164 | -3,682% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.92B | 19.4M | 30,531% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.22 | -2.11 | 485% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.87 | 7.80 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.69 | 9.13 | -172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.22 | 1.67 | 493% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement