Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs RYHAX
FSPHX vs RYHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYHAX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RYHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. RYHAX (19.1M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYHAX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYHAX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYHAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYHAX (27 years). RYHAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). RYHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 116.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYHAX: FSPHX (0) vs RYHAX (2500). RYHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.27 vs. FSPHX (-16.06). RYHAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.30 vs. FSPHX (-2.55).
| FSPHX | RYHAX | FSPHX / RYHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.65 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.68 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.817 | -5.978 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 19.1M | 33,586% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.06 | -9.27 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.21 | -10.77 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.55 | 15.30 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.12 | -3.11 | -165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers