Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYHAX
FSPHX vs RYHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYHAX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RYHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.92B vs. RYHAX (18.4M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYHAX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYHAX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYHAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYHAX (27 years). RYHAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). RYHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 236.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYHAX: FSPHX (0) vs RYHAX (2500). RYHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.78 vs. FSPHX (-13.83). RYHAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.95 vs. FSPHX (-16.43).
| FSPHX | RYHAX | FSPHX / RYHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.65 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.68 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.651 | 0.755 | -749% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.92B | 18.4M | 32,190% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.83 | -5.78 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.48 | 6.05 | -74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.43 | 5.95 | -276% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.58 | 0.46 | 1,206% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement