Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYHAX
FSPHX vs RYHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYHAX commentary
Oct 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and RYHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. RYHAX (23.6M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYHAX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYHAX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYHAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYHAX (27 years). RYHAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). RYHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 236.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYHAX: FSPHX (0) vs RYHAX (2500). RYHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.09 vs. FSPHX (-10.90). RYHAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.38 vs. FSPHX (-10.69).
| FSPHX | RYHAX | FSPHX / RYHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.64 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.69 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.165 | 7.526 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 23.6M | 25,271% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.90 | 0.09 | -12,102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.07 | 19.07 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.69 | 13.38 | -80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.08 | 27.99 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement