Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYHAX
FSPHX vs RYHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYHAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RYHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. RYHAX (21.5M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYHAX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYHAX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYHAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYHAX (28 years). RYHAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). RYHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 236.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYHAX: FSPHX (0) vs RYHAX (2500). RYHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.92 vs. FSPHX (0.35). RYHAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.86 vs. FSPHX (-8.45).
| FSPHX | RYHAX | FSPHX / RYHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.64 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.69 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.569 | 12.053 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 21.5M | 28,912% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.35 | 9.92 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.51 | 17.69 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.45 | 11.86 | -71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.39 | 35.72 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement