Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYOAX
FSPHX vs RYOAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYOAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and RYOAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. RYOAX (83.5M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYOAX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYOAX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYOAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYOAX (27 years). RYOAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). RYOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYOAX: FSPHX (0) vs RYOAX (2500). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.67 vs. RYOAX (-18.60). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.93 vs. RYOAX (-35.27).
| FSPHX | RYOAX | FSPHX / RYOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.65 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.68 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.266 | -2.090 | 348% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 83.5M | 7,022% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.67 | -18.60 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.50 | -8.33 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.93 | -35.27 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.04 | -43.43 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers