Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYOAX
FSPHX vs RYOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYOAX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a StrongBuy and RYOAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. RYOAX (87.7M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYOAX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYOAX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYOAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYOAX (27 years). RYOAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). RYOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYOAX: FSPHX (0) vs RYOAX (2500). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.45 vs. RYOAX (-16.36). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -16.04 vs. RYOAX (-30.33).
| FSPHX | RYOAX | FSPHX / RYOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.65 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.68 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.110 | 7.141 | -58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.74B | 87.7M | 6,539% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.45 | -16.36 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.07 | -8.69 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.04 | -30.33 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.56 | -38.57 | -25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement