Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs RYOAX
FSPHX vs RYOAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYOAX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and RYOAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. RYOAX (80.7M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYOAX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYOAX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYOAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYOAX (27 years). RYOAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). RYOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYOAX: FSPHX (0) vs RYOAX (2500). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.94 vs. RYOAX (-16.71). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -11.25 vs. RYOAX (-34.93).
| FSPHX | RYOAX | FSPHX / RYOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.65 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.68 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.367 | -6.716 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 80.7M | 7,949% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.94 | -16.71 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.28 | -16.94 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.25 | -34.93 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.98 | -46.30 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers