Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs SHSKX
FSPHX vs SHSKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SHSKX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and SHSKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSKX has more cash in the bank: 6.58B vs. FSPHX (6.2B). SHSKX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: SHSKX (0.40) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SHSKX: FSPHX (44 years) vs SHSKX (9 years). SHSKX (0.75) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. SHSKX (27.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSKX: FSPHX (0) vs SHSKX (5000000). FSPHX (-12.07) and SHSKX (-12.63) have marching annual gain over last year. SHSKX return over 5 years is better than : -3.03 vs. FSPHX (-12.51).
| FSPHX | SHSKX | FSPHX / SHSKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.75 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.75 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.789 | -1.885 | 360% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.2B | 6.58B | 94% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.40 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.07 | -12.63 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.05 | -5.37 | -20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.51 | -3.03 | 413% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement