Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs SHSKX
FSPHX vs SHSKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SHSKX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a StrongBuy and SHSKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSKX has more cash in the bank: 6.23B vs. FSPHX (5.88B). SHSKX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: SHSKX (0.41) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SHSKX: FSPHX (44 years) vs SHSKX (9 years). SHSKX (0.75) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). SHSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSKX: FSPHX (0) vs SHSKX (5000000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.02 vs. SHSKX (-15.67). SHSKX (-10.17) and FSPHX (-10.60) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSPHX | SHSKX | FSPHX / SHSKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.75 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.75 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.110 | -3.325 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.88B | 6.23B | 94% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.41 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.02 | -15.67 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.23 | 2.28 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.60 | -10.17 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement