Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs SHSKX
FSPHX vs SHSKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SHSKX commentary
Apr 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and SHSKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSKX (6.6B) and FSPHX (6.42B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . SHSKX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: SHSKX (0.39) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SHSKX: FSPHX (44 years) vs SHSKX (9 years). SHSKX (0.75) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SHSKX (27.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSKX: FSPHX (0) vs SHSKX (5000000). SHSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.74 vs. FSPHX (-14.91). SHSKX return over 5 years is better than : 12.26 vs. FSPHX (2.74).
| FSPHX | SHSKX | FSPHX / SHSKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.743 | -4.230 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 6.6B | 97% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.39 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.91 | -11.74 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.76 | -13.66 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.74 | 12.26 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers