Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs SWHFX
FSPHX vs SWHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SWHFX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and SWHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.92B vs. SWHFX (646M). SWHFX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: SWHFX (0.70) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SWHFX: FSPHX (44 years) vs SWHFX (25 years). SWHFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). SWHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and SWHFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.98 vs. SWHFX (-13.04). SWHFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.97 vs. FSPHX (-15.46).
| FSPHX | SWHFX | FSPHX / SWHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.79 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.79 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.798 | 1.421 | -408% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.92B | 646M | 917% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.70 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.98 | -13.04 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.60 | -7.64 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.46 | -8.97 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.52 | -12.89 | -66% |