Ad is loading...
FSRAX vs HBLCX
FSRAX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSRAX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Ret A
Price$8.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets479.95M
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.10
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.1B
FSRAX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRAX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRAX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. FSRAX (480M). FSRAX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: FSRAX (4.95) vs HBLCX (2.65). FSRAX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FSRAX (19 years) vs HBLCX (18 years). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSRAX (29.00). FSRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FSRAX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSRAX: HBLCX (2000) vs FSRAX (500). FSRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.67 vs. HBLCX (5.09). FSRAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.33 vs. HBLCX (4.44).
| FSRAX | HBLCX | FSRAX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.434 | 1.293 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 480M | 12.1B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.95 | 2.65 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.67 | 5.09 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.95 | -2.03 | -393% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.33 | 4.44 | 638% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.08 | 24.83 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers