Ad is loading...
FSRAX vs HBLCX
FSRAX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSRAX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Ret A
Price$8.44
Change+$0.05 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets496.03M
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$13.95
Change+$0.12 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55B
FSRAX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRAX vs. HBLCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRAX is a Buy and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. FSRAX (496M). FSRAX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: FSRAX (4.43) vs HBLCX (2.64). FSRAX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FSRAX (20 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FSRAX (1.03). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FSRAX (23.00). FSRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FSRAX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSRAX: HBLCX (2000) vs FSRAX (500). FSRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.57 vs. HBLCX (2.30). FSRAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.19 vs. HBLCX (12.10).
| FSRAX | HBLCX | FSRAX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.64 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.64 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.613 | 0.043 | 1,435% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 496M | 11.5B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.43 | 2.64 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | 2.30 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.51 | 2.02 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.19 | 12.10 | 374% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.28 | 20.94 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers