FSRCY
Price
$109.15
Change
+$10.09 (+10.19%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.78B
WWNTF
Price
$0.64
Change
+$0.01 (+1.59%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
8.27B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSRCY vs WWNTF

Header iconFSRCY vs WWNTF Comparison
Open Charts FSRCY vs WWNTFBanner chart's image
First Resources
Price$109.15
Change+$10.09 (+10.19%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.78B
Want Want China Holdings
Price$0.64
Change+$0.01 (+1.59%)
Volume$3.2K
Capitalization8.27B
FSRCY vs WWNTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSRCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WWNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSRCY vs. WWNTF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRCY is a Hold and WWNTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FSRCY: $99.22 vs. WWNTF: $0.64)
Brand notoriety: FSRCY and WWNTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSRCY: 100% vs. WWNTF: 83%
Market capitalization -- FSRCY: $1.78B vs. WWNTF: $8.27B
FSRCY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $1.78B. WWNTF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $8.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSRCY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWWNTF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSRCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WWNTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FSRCY and WWNTF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSRCY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWNTF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSRCY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • WWNTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WWNTF is a better buy in the short-term than FSRCY.

Price Growth

FSRCY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WWNTF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSRCY is expected to report earnings on Apr 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.77% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WWNTF($8.27B) has a higher market cap than FSRCY($1.78B). FSRCY has higher P/E ratio than WWNTF: FSRCY (19.31) vs WWNTF (16.08). WWNTF YTD gains are higher at: 11.348 vs. FSRCY (-4.886). WWNTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.16B vs. FSRCY (517M). WWNTF has more cash in the bank: 8.66B vs. FSRCY (434M). FSRCY has less debt than WWNTF: FSRCY (296M) vs WWNTF (6.29B). WWNTF has higher revenues than FSRCY: WWNTF (23.4B) vs FSRCY (1.23B).
FSRCYWWNTFFSRCY / WWNTF
Capitalization1.78B8.27B21%
EBITDA517M5.16B10%
Gain YTD-4.88611.348-43%
P/E Ratio19.3116.08120%
Revenue1.23B23.4B5%
Total Cash434M8.66B5%
Total Debt296M6.29B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSRCY vs WWNTF: Fundamental Ratings
FSRCY
WWNTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10082
SMR RATING
1..100
5116
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1676
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WWNTF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as FSRCY (19). This means that WWNTF’s stock grew similarly to FSRCY’s over the last 12 months.

WWNTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as FSRCY (100). This means that WWNTF’s stock grew similarly to FSRCY’s over the last 12 months.

WWNTF's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSRCY (51). This means that WWNTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSRCY’s over the last 12 months.

WWNTF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as FSRCY (75). This means that WWNTF’s stock grew similarly to FSRCY’s over the last 12 months.

FSRCY's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WWNTF (76). This means that FSRCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than WWNTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSRCYWWNTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSRCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WWNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TDVI27.380.21
+0.77%
FT Vest Tech Div Trgt Inc ETF
ASHR27.740.20
+0.73%
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A ETF
CMDT25.930.05
+0.19%
PIMCO Commodity Strategy Act Exc-Trd Fd
EPV25.85N/A
N/A
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe
ROPE25.24N/A
N/A
Coastal Compass 100 ETF

FSRCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSRCY and ATPC have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSRCY and ATPC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSRCY
1D Price
Change %
FSRCY100%
N/A
ATPC - FSRCY
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
WLMIF - FSRCY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGAAF - FSRCY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WWNTF - FSRCY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTSDF - FSRCY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WWNTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WWNTF and PSYCF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WWNTF and PSYCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WWNTF
1D Price
Change %
WWNTF100%
N/A
PSYCF - WWNTF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
WLMIY - WWNTF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
WWNTY - WWNTF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSF - WWNTF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
ATPC - WWNTF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
More