FSRCY
Price
$109.15
Change
+$10.09 (+10.19%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
2.13B
WWNTF
Price
$0.71
Change
-$0.01 (-1.39%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
8.62B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSRCY vs WWNTF

Header iconFSRCY vs WWNTF Comparison
Open Charts FSRCY vs WWNTFBanner chart's image
First Resources
Price$109.15
Change+$10.09 (+10.19%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.13B
Want Want China Holdings
Price$0.71
Change-$0.01 (-1.39%)
Volume$7K
Capitalization8.62B
FSRCY vs WWNTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSRCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WWNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSRCY vs. WWNTF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRCY is a Hold and WWNTF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FSRCY: $99.22 vs. WWNTF: $0.71)
Brand notoriety: FSRCY and WWNTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSRCY: 100% vs. WWNTF: 161%
Market capitalization -- FSRCY: $2.13B vs. WWNTF: $8.62B
FSRCY [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $2.13B. WWNTF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $8.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $230.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSRCY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWWNTF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSRCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WWNTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WWNTF is a better buy in the long-term than FSRCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSRCY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWNTF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSRCY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • WWNTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FSRCY and WWNTF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FSRCY (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WWNTF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1016.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.96% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WWNTF($8.62B) has a higher market cap than FSRCY($2.13B). WWNTF has higher P/E ratio than FSRCY: WWNTF (13.81) vs FSRCY (9.58). WWNTF YTD gains are higher at: 22.740 vs. FSRCY (-4.886). WWNTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.77B vs. FSRCY (428M). WWNTF has more cash in the bank: 7.86B vs. FSRCY (106M). FSRCY has less debt than WWNTF: FSRCY (270M) vs WWNTF (6.46B). WWNTF has higher revenues than FSRCY: WWNTF (23.2B) vs FSRCY (1.04B).
FSRCYWWNTFFSRCY / WWNTF
Capitalization2.13B8.62B25%
EBITDA428M5.77B7%
Gain YTD-4.88622.740-21%
P/E Ratio9.5813.8169%
Revenue1.04B23.2B4%
Total Cash106M7.86B1%
Total Debt270M6.46B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSRCY vs WWNTF: Fundamental Ratings
FSRCY
WWNTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4596
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10074
SMR RATING
1..100
5018
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1563
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSRCY's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as WWNTF (17). This means that FSRCY’s stock grew similarly to WWNTF’s over the last 12 months.

WWNTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as FSRCY (100). This means that WWNTF’s stock grew similarly to FSRCY’s over the last 12 months.

WWNTF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as FSRCY (50). This means that WWNTF’s stock grew similarly to FSRCY’s over the last 12 months.

WWNTF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FSRCY (74). This means that WWNTF’s stock grew similarly to FSRCY’s over the last 12 months.

FSRCY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WWNTF (63). This means that FSRCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than WWNTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSRCYWWNTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
12%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSRCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WWNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QAT20.540.02
+0.10%
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
HYDB47.34N/A
N/A
iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
BGH16.23-0.07
-0.43%
Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund
SIMS38.35-0.60
-1.53%
SPDR® S&P Kensho Intelligent Strctr ETF
MHNC17.45-0.70
-3.86%
MAIDEN HOLDINGS NORTH AMERICA Ltd

FSRCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSRCY and ATPC have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSRCY and ATPC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSRCY
1D Price
Change %
FSRCY100%
N/A
ATPC - FSRCY
0%
Poorly correlated
+4.13%
WLMIF - FSRCY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGAAF - FSRCY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WWNTF - FSRCY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTSDF - FSRCY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More