Ad is loading...
FSRKX vs HBLCX
FSRKX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSRKX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return K6
Price$8.62
Change+$0.03 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets479.95M
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.26
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.14B
FSRKX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRKX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRKX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. FSRKX (480M). FSRKX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: FSRKX (5.28) vs HBLCX (2.65). FSRKX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FSRKX (5 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSRKX (29.00). FSRKX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FSRKX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). FSRKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.41 vs. HBLCX (5.15). FSRKX return over 5 years is better than : 33.09 vs. HBLCX (5.90).
| FSRKX | HBLCX | FSRKX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.657 | 2.083 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 480M | 12.1B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.28 | 2.65 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.41 | 5.15 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.40 | -0.94 | -998% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.09 | 5.90 | 561% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 25.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers