Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRKX vs HBLCX
FSRKX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSRKX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return K6
Price$8.91
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets500.58M
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.70
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.58B
FSRKX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRKX vs. HBLCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRKX is a Hold and HBLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. FSRKX (501M). FSRKX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: FSRKX (4.92) vs HBLCX (2.59). FSRKX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FSRKX (6 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FSRKX (0.63). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FSRKX (23.00). FSRKX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FSRKX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). FSRKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.17 vs. HBLCX (1.95). FSRKX return over 5 years is better than : 40.51 vs. HBLCX (8.03).
| FSRKX | HBLCX | FSRKX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.64 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.64 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.969 | 7.576 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 501M | 11.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.92 | 2.59 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.17 | 1.95 | 418% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.63 | 13.59 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.51 | 8.03 | 504% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers