Ad is loading...
FSRKX vs HBLCX
FSRKX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSRKX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return K6
Price$8.39
Change-$0.24 (-2.78%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$13.97
Change-$0.21 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FSRKX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRKX vs. HBLCX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRKX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. FSRKX (501M). FSRKX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: FSRKX (5.28) vs HBLCX (2.65). FSRKX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FSRKX (5 years) vs HBLCX (18 years). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSRKX (29.00). FSRKX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FSRKX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.03 vs. FSRKX (7.32). FSRKX return over 5 years is better than : 31.06 vs. HBLCX (10.02).
| FSRKX | HBLCX | FSRKX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.544 | 6.933 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 501M | 11.8B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.28 | 2.65 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.32 | 8.03 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.22 | 1.39 | 737% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.06 | 10.02 | 310% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers