Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs HOOCX
FSSNX vs HOOCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs HOOCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$25.23
Change-$0.04 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.69B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps C
Price$25.83
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.69M
FSSNX vs HOOCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. HOOCX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and HOOCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. HOOCX (193M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than HOOCX: FSSNX (1.16) vs HOOCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than HOOCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs HOOCX (9 years). HOOCX (2.16) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). HOOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HOOCX: FSSNX (0) vs HOOCX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.96 vs. HOOCX (-8.31). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 58.99 vs. HOOCX (27.24).
| FSSNX | HOOCX | FSSNX / HOOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.10 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.16 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.851 | -9.209 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 193M | 12,280% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.96 | -8.31 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.55 | 0.23 | 8,826% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.99 | 27.24 | 217% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...