Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs HOOCX
FSSNX vs HOOCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs HOOCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$25.12
Change-$0.69 (-2.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.76B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps C
Price$26.17
Change-$0.78 (-2.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.06M
FSSNX vs HOOCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. HOOCX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and HOOCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.8B vs. HOOCX (206M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than HOOCX: FSSNX (1.06) vs HOOCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than HOOCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs HOOCX (8 years). HOOCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). HOOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HOOCX: FSSNX (0) vs HOOCX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.12 vs. HOOCX (-4.19). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 71.60 vs. HOOCX (35.16).
| FSSNX | HOOCX | FSSNX / HOOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.11 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.15 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.756 | -5.272 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.8B | 206M | 12,524% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.12 | -4.19 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.01 | -3.34 | -300% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.60 | 35.16 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.31 | N/A | - |