Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs MOPAX
FSSNX vs MOPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs MOPAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$23.44
Change+$0.21 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17B
NYLI WMC Small Companies
Price$21.41
Change+$0.26 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.41M
FSSNX vs MOPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. MOPAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and MOPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. MOPAX (247M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than MOPAX: FSSNX (1.13) vs MOPAX (0.19). FSSNX was incepted earlier than MOPAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs MOPAX (21 years). MOPAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). MOPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MOPAX: FSSNX (0) vs MOPAX (15000). MOPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.36 vs. FSSNX (-2.89). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 58.52 vs. MOPAX (19.64).
| FSSNX | MOPAX | FSSNX / MOPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.21 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.21 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.077 | -15.907 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 15000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 247M | 9,798% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.19 | 599% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.89 | -1.36 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.68 | -7.78 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.52 | 19.64 | 298% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.79 | -19.28 | -227% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...