Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NINAX
FSSNX vs NINAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NINAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.52
Change+$0.09 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.03B
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value A
Price$22.98
Change-$0.07 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
FSSNX vs NINAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NINAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and NINAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29B vs. NINAX (1.19B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than NINAX: FSSNX (0.80) vs NINAX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NINAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs NINAX (16 years). NINAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NINAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NINAX: FSSNX (0) vs NINAX (1000). NINAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.66 vs. FSSNX (3.04). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. NINAX (35.03).
| FSSNX | NINAX | FSSNX / NINAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.31 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.31 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.322 | 9.657 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29B | 1.19B | 2,431% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.04 | 10.66 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.74 | 23.86 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | 35.03 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.31 | 57.87 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement