Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs NINAX
FSSNX vs NINAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NINAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$23.84
Change+$1.90 (+8.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17B
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value A
Price$17.94
Change+$1.55 (+9.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets932.08M
FSSNX vs NINAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NINAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and NINAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. NINAX (932M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than NINAX: FSSNX (1.13) vs NINAX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NINAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs NINAX (15 years). NINAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NINAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NINAX: FSSNX (0) vs NINAX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.11 vs. NINAX (-20.32). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 47.63 vs. NINAX (41.17).
| FSSNX | NINAX | FSSNX / NINAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.31 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.31 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.737 | -22.027 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 932M | 2,597% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.11 | -20.32 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.29 | -22.25 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.63 | 41.17 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.88 | 5.60 | 641% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers