Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NMSCX
FSSNX vs NMSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NMSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$27.96
Change-$0.36 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst
Price$21.71
Change-$0.23 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.62B
FSSNX vs NMSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NMSCX commentary
Jul 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and NMSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. NMSCX (2.62B). NMSCX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: NMSCX (1.48) vs FSSNX (0.92). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NMSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs NMSCX (29 years). NMSCX (0.20) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NMSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSCX: FSSNX (0) vs NMSCX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.79 vs. NMSCX (-8.48). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 64.20 vs. NMSCX (22.04).
| FSSNX | NMSCX | FSSNX / NMSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.012 | -5.403 | -19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 2.62B | 976% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.48 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.79 | -8.48 | -80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.78 | -2.13 | -1,684% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.20 | 22.04 | 291% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.20 | 0.43 | 16,967% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers