Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NMSCX
FSSNX vs NMSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NMSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.65
Change-$0.15 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.89B
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst
Price$22.72
Change-$0.08 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.66B
FSSNX vs NMSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NMSCX commentary
Aug 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and NMSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. NMSCX (2.66B). NMSCX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: NMSCX (1.39) vs FSSNX (0.84). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NMSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs NMSCX (29 years). NMSCX (0.20) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NMSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSCX: FSSNX (0) vs NMSCX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.63 vs. NMSCX (-8.64). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 57.46 vs. NMSCX (14.72).
| FSSNX | NMSCX | FSSNX / NMSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.659 | -0.654 | -1,172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9B | 2.66B | 973% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.39 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.63 | -8.64 | -111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.46 | -3.27 | -1,054% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.46 | 14.72 | 390% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.90 | 16.91 | 638% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement