Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NMSCX
FSSNX vs NMSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NMSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$26.36
Change-$0.05 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.88B
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst
Price$20.43
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.49B
FSSNX vs NMSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NMSCX commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and NMSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. NMSCX (2.49B). NMSCX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: NMSCX (1.53) vs FSSNX (1.10). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NMSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs NMSCX (29 years). NMSCX (0.20) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NMSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSCX: FSSNX (0) vs NMSCX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.36 vs. NMSCX (-9.82). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 55.70 vs. NMSCX (14.89).
| FSSNX | NMSCX | FSSNX / NMSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.588 | -10.893 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.9B | 2.49B | 1,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.53 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.36 | -9.82 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.95 | -9.33 | -332% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.70 | 14.89 | 374% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.86 | -7.14 | -853% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement