Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs QCSCX
FSSNX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QCSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.26
Change+$0.12 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.09B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$21.43
Change+$0.06 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
FSSNX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QCSCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and QCSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.1B vs. QCSCX (1.45B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: FSSNX (1.36) vs QCSCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: FSSNX (13 years) vs QCSCX (19 years). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 128.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCSCX: FSSNX (0) vs QCSCX (1500). QCSCX (20.33) and FSSNX (20.08) have marching annual gain over last year. FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. QCSCX (24.45).
| FSSNX | QCSCX | FSSNX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.095 | 2.048 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.1B | 1.45B | 1,869% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.08 | 20.33 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.99 | 7.42 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | 24.45 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.83 | 57.69 | 156% |