Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs QCSCX
FSSNX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QCSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.52
Change+$0.09 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.03B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$22.43
Change+$0.07 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.44B
FSSNX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QCSCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and QCSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29B vs. QCSCX (1.44B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: FSSNX (0.80) vs QCSCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs QCSCX (20 years). QCSCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCSCX: FSSNX (0) vs QCSCX (1500). QCSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.76 vs. FSSNX (3.04). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. QCSCX (27.44).
| FSSNX | QCSCX | FSSNX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.00 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.00 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.322 | 6.810 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29B | 1.44B | 2,015% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.04 | 4.76 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.74 | 35.37 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | 27.44 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.31 | 58.85 | 164% |