Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs QCSCX
FSSNX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QCSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.29
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$21.40
Change-$0.04 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
FSSNX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QCSCX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and QCSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. QCSCX (1.48B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: FSSNX (0.92) vs QCSCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs QCSCX (20 years). QCSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCSCX: FSSNX (0) vs QCSCX (1500). QCSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.79 vs. FSSNX (1.59). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 57.41 vs. QCSCX (41.61).
| FSSNX | QCSCX | FSSNX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.99 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.99 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.204 | 2.095 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 1.48B | 1,730% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.59 | 4.79 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.84 | 23.79 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.41 | 41.61 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.03 | 48.07 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement