Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs QCSCX
FSSNX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QCSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$25.53
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.69B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$19.34
Change-$0.08 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
FSSNX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QCSCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and QCSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. QCSCX (1.3B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: FSSNX (1.16) vs QCSCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs QCSCX (20 years). QCSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCSCX: FSSNX (0) vs QCSCX (1500). QCSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.47 vs. FSSNX (-0.21). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 57.76 vs. QCSCX (44.54).
| FSSNX | QCSCX | FSSNX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.99 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.99 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.731 | -7.905 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 1.3B | 1,817% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.21 | 1.47 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.82 | 13.36 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.76 | 44.54 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.53 | 31.92 | 186% |