Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs QCSCX
FSSNX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QCSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$23.18
Change+$0.36 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$17.48
Change+$0.20 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.16B
FSSNX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QCSCX commentary
Apr 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and QCSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. QCSCX (1.16B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: FSSNX (1.13) vs QCSCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs QCSCX (20 years). QCSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCSCX: FSSNX (0) vs QCSCX (1500). QCSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.97 vs. FSSNX (-7.57). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 55.97 vs. QCSCX (40.51).
| FSSNX | QCSCX | FSSNX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.99 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.99 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.257 | -16.762 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 1.16B | 2,079% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.57 | -6.97 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.69 | -7.76 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.97 | 40.51 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.48 | 18.51 | 235% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...