Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs QCSCX
FSSNX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QCSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$27.28
Change-$0.83 (-2.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.16B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$20.58
Change-$0.64 (-3.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
FSSNX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QCSCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and QCSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. QCSCX (1.39B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: FSSNX (1.36) vs QCSCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: FSSNX (13 years) vs QCSCX (19 years). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 128.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCSCX: FSSNX (0) vs QCSCX (1500). QCSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.18 vs. FSSNX (10.61). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. QCSCX (21.85).
| FSSNX | QCSCX | FSSNX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.445 | -2.000 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.2B | 1.39B | 1,960% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.61 | 11.18 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.37 | 7.47 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.70 | 21.85 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.57 | 43.41 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...