Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs QCSCX
FSSNX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QCSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$26.27
Change-$0.27 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.88B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$20.02
Change-$0.23 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
FSSNX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QCSCX commentary
Jun 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and QCSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. QCSCX (1.36B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: FSSNX (1.10) vs QCSCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs QCSCX (20 years). QCSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCSCX: FSSNX (0) vs QCSCX (1500). QCSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.05 vs. FSSNX (6.63). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 55.52 vs. QCSCX (40.63).
| FSSNX | QCSCX | FSSNX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.99 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.99 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.118 | -3.571 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.9B | 1.36B | 1,834% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.63 | 10.05 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.83 | 28.65 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.52 | 40.63 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.11 | 35.72 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement