Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs SCSIX
FSSNX vs SCSIX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs SCSIX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$23.44
Change+$0.21 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17B
Sterling Capital SmCp Val R6
Price$34.83
Change+$0.30 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets145.84M
FSSNX vs SCSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. SCSIX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and SCSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. SCSIX (146M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than SCSIX: FSSNX (1.13) vs SCSIX (0.34). FSSNX was incepted earlier than SCSIX: FSSNX (14 years) vs SCSIX (5 years). SCSIX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. SCSIX (2.87). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCSIX: FSSNX (0) vs SCSIX (10000000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.01 vs. SCSIX (-17.70). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 59.95 vs. SCSIX (-37.36).
| FSSNX | SCSIX | FSSNX / SCSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.93 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.06 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.318 | -11.216 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 146M | 16,575% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.34 | 332% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.01 | -17.70 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.79 | -48.41 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.95 | -37.36 | -160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.09 | 209.34 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...