Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs SCUVX
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs SCUVX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$27.28
Change-$0.83 (-2.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.16B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps A
Price$28.91
Change-$0.61 (-2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets217.82M
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. SCUVX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and SCUVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. SCUVX (218M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than SCUVX: FSSNX (1.36) vs SCUVX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than SCUVX: FSSNX (13 years) vs SCUVX (19 years). SCUVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCUVX: FSSNX (0) vs SCUVX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.61 vs. SCUVX (4.11). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. SCUVX (11.11).
| FSSNX | SCUVX | FSSNX / SCUVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.445 | -0.069 | 2,090% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.2B | 218M | 12,477% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.61 | 4.11 | 259% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.37 | 2.52 | 650% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.70 | 11.11 | 330% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.57 | 15.81 | 465% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...