Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs SCUVX
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs SCUVX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.26
Change+$0.12 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.09B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps A
Price$29.67
Change+$0.24 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.31M
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. SCUVX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and SCUVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.1B vs. SCUVX (228M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than SCUVX: FSSNX (1.36) vs SCUVX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than SCUVX: FSSNX (13 years) vs SCUVX (19 years). SCUVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCUVX: FSSNX (0) vs SCUVX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.08 vs. SCUVX (11.75). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. SCUVX (11.67).
| FSSNX | SCUVX | FSSNX / SCUVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.095 | 2.558 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.1B | 228M | 11,886% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.08 | 11.75 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.99 | 0.64 | 2,171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | 11.67 | 343% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.83 | 25.10 | 358% |