Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs SCUVX
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs SCUVX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$25.27
Change+$0.46 (+1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.69B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps A
Price$26.38
Change+$0.25 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets191.74M
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. SCUVX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and SCUVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. SCUVX (192M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than SCUVX: FSSNX (1.16) vs SCUVX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than SCUVX: FSSNX (14 years) vs SCUVX (19 years). SCUVX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). SCUVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCUVX: FSSNX (0) vs SCUVX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.73 vs. SCUVX (-7.41). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 56.34 vs. SCUVX (31.11).
| FSSNX | SCUVX | FSSNX / SCUVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.35 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.40 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.368 | -9.679 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 192M | 12,344% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.73 | -7.41 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.54 | 1.40 | 1,327% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.34 | 31.11 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.12 | 4.51 | 1,268% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...