Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs SCUVX
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs SCUVX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$26.19
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.88B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps A
Price$26.54
Change-$0.07 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.45M
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. SCUVX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and SCUVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. SCUVX (193M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than SCUVX: FSSNX (1.10) vs SCUVX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than SCUVX: FSSNX (14 years) vs SCUVX (19 years). SCUVX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). SCUVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCUVX: FSSNX (0) vs SCUVX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.21 vs. SCUVX (-5.50). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 45.48 vs. SCUVX (17.38).
| FSSNX | SCUVX | FSSNX / SCUVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.35 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.40 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.347 | -8.019 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.9B | 193M | 12,902% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.21 | -5.50 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.55 | -2.56 | -646% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.48 | 17.38 | 262% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.10 | 4.96 | 1,312% |