Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs SCUVX
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs SCUVX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$27.86
Change+$0.27 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps A
Price$27.70
Change+$0.18 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.57M
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. SCUVX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and SCUVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. SCUVX (197M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than SCUVX: FSSNX (0.92) vs SCUVX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than SCUVX: FSSNX (14 years) vs SCUVX (19 years). SCUVX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). SCUVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCUVX: FSSNX (0) vs SCUVX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.06 vs. SCUVX (-9.68). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 56.39 vs. SCUVX (25.72).
| FSSNX | SCUVX | FSSNX / SCUVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.35 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.40 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.325 | -4.874 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 197M | 12,995% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.06 | -9.68 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.68 | 10.92 | 299% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.39 | 25.72 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.68 | 7.62 | 941% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement