Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs SCUVX
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs SCUVX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$23.44
Change+$0.21 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps A
Price$24.85
Change+$0.13 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets183.02M
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. SCUVX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and SCUVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. SCUVX (183M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than SCUVX: FSSNX (1.13) vs SCUVX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than SCUVX: FSSNX (14 years) vs SCUVX (19 years). SCUVX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). SCUVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCUVX: FSSNX (0) vs SCUVX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.89 vs. SCUVX (-7.86). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 58.52 vs. SCUVX (33.05).
| FSSNX | SCUVX | FSSNX / SCUVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.36 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.40 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.077 | -14.552 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 183M | 13,224% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.89 | -7.86 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.68 | -11.14 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.52 | 33.05 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.79 | -3.18 | -1,378% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...