Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WEMMX
FSSNX vs WEMMX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WEMMX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$27.72
Change-$0.08 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.89B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites AAA
Price$16.53
Change-$0.06 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets197.4M
FSSNX vs WEMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WEMMX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WEMMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. WEMMX (197M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WEMMX: FSSNX (0.90) vs WEMMX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WEMMX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WEMMX (27 years). WEMMX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. WEMMX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEMMX: FSSNX (0) vs WEMMX (1000). WEMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.79 vs. FSSNX (10.79). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 47.93 vs. WEMMX (-27.95).
| FSSNX | WEMMX | FSSNX / WEMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.434 | 4.603 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9B | 197M | 13,147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.79 | 11.79 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.06 | -30.37 | -66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.93 | -27.95 | -171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.21 | -29.26 | -271% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement