Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WEMMX
FSSNX vs WEMMX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WEMMX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$26.41
Change+$0.14 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.88B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites AAA
Price$15.78
Change+$0.08 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.64M
FSSNX vs WEMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WEMMX commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and WEMMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. WEMMX (195M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WEMMX: FSSNX (1.10) vs WEMMX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WEMMX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WEMMX (27 years). WEMMX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. WEMMX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEMMX: FSSNX (0) vs WEMMX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.94 vs. WEMMX (-14.43). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 55.70 vs. WEMMX (-24.64).
| FSSNX | WEMMX | FSSNX / WEMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.588 | -0.504 | 910% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.9B | 195M | 12,769% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.94 | -14.43 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.17 | -26.73 | -124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.70 | -24.64 | -226% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.31 | -35.57 | -175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement