Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WHGCX
FSSNX vs WHGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WHGCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$27.59
Change-$0.56 (-1.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund C
Price$19.80
Change-$0.42 (-2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
FSSNX vs WHGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WHGCX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and WHGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. WHGCX (1.02B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WHGCX: FSSNX (0.92) vs WHGCX (0.26). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WHGCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WHGCX (6 years). WHGCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). WHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGCX: FSSNX (0) vs WHGCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.47 vs. WHGCX (-2.99). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 60.17 vs. WHGCX (46.77).
| FSSNX | WHGCX | FSSNX / WHGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.79 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.93 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.698 | 1.557 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 1.02B | 2,517% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.26 | 349% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.47 | -2.99 | -149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.37 | 17.75 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.17 | 46.77 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement