Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs WHGCX
FSSNX vs WHGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WHGCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.74
Change+$0.14 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.09B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund C
Price$20.49
Change-$0.06 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
FSSNX vs WHGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WHGCX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WHGCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.1B vs. WHGCX (1.1B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WHGCX: FSSNX (1.36) vs WHGCX (0.95). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WHGCX: FSSNX (13 years) vs WHGCX (5 years). WHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGCX: FSSNX (0) vs WHGCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.29 vs. WHGCX (4.92). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 44.88 vs. WHGCX (20.62).
| FSSNX | WHGCX | FSSNX / WHGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.324 | 3.214 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.1B | 1.1B | 2,461% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.95 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.29 | 4.92 | 372% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.60 | 5.50 | 393% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.88 | 20.62 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.10 | N/A | - |