Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs WHGCX
FSSNX vs WHGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WHGCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$24.40
Change+$0.48 (+2.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund C
Price$17.50
Change+$0.24 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets896.95M
FSSNX vs WHGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WHGCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and WHGCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. WHGCX (897M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WHGCX: FSSNX (1.13) vs WHGCX (0.28). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WHGCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WHGCX (6 years). WHGCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). WHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGCX: FSSNX (0) vs WHGCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.38 vs. WHGCX (-13.42). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 62.71 vs. WHGCX (45.26).
| FSSNX | WHGCX | FSSNX / WHGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.79 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.92 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.584 | -13.310 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 897M | 2,698% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.28 | 412% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.38 | -13.42 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.09 | -7.51 | -41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.71 | 45.26 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...