Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WHGMX
FSSNX vs WHGMX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WHGMX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$26.63
Change+$0.44 (+1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.88B
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund Inst
Price$15.67
Change+$0.17 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.57M
FSSNX vs WHGMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WHGMX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and WHGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. WHGMX (91.6M). WHGMX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: WHGMX (1.25) vs FSSNX (1.10). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WHGMX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WHGMX (19 years). WHGMX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). WHGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGMX: FSSNX (0) vs WHGMX (100000). FSSNX (3.90) and WHGMX (3.89) have marching annual gain over last year. FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. WHGMX (34.88).
| FSSNX | WHGMX | FSSNX / WHGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.07 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.383 | -2.146 | 251% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.9B | 91.6M | 27,183% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.25 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.90 | 3.89 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.69 | 17.80 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.42 | 34.88 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.51 | -3.83 | -1,712% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers