Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs WICVX
FSSNX vs WICVX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WICVX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$23.92
Change+$0.36 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17B
Wasatch Small Cap Value Institutional
Price$8.54
Change+$0.14 (+1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
FSSNX vs WICVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WICVX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and WICVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. WICVX (1.38B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WICVX: FSSNX (1.13) vs WICVX (0.18). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WICVX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WICVX (13 years). WICVX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). WICVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WICVX: FSSNX (0) vs WICVX (100000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.20 vs. WICVX (-20.10). FSSNX (60.26) and WICVX (57.47) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSSNX | WICVX | FSSNX / WICVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.06 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.06 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.884 | -16.000 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 1.38B | 1,757% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.18 | 623% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.20 | -20.10 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.26 | -7.95 | -28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.26 | 57.47 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.51 | 31.60 | 144% |