Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs WMCVX
FSSNX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMCVX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.74
Change+$0.14 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.09B
FSSNX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMCVX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WMCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.1B vs. WMCVX (1.68B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: FSSNX (1.36) vs WMCVX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: FSSNX (13 years) vs WMCVX (27 years). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMCVX: FSSNX (0) vs WMCVX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.29 vs. WMCVX (3.26). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 44.88 vs. WMCVX (28.32).
| FSSNX | WMCVX | FSSNX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.324 | 4.559 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.1B | 1.68B | 1,610% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.29 | 3.26 | 561% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.60 | 7.78 | 277% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.88 | 28.32 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.10 | 75.84 | 117% |