Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WMCVX
FSSNX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMCVX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.00
Change+$0.65 (+2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.03B
FSSNX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMCVX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and WMCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29B vs. WMCVX (1.41B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: FSSNX (0.80) vs WMCVX (0.06). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WMCVX (28 years). WMCVX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMCVX: FSSNX (0) vs WMCVX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.35 vs. WMCVX (-25.16). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.88 vs. WMCVX (9.96).
| FSSNX | WMCVX | FSSNX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.18 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.18 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.646 | -4.053 | -238% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29B | 1.41B | 2,061% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.06 | 1,300% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.35 | -25.16 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.47 | 7.31 | 485% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.88 | 9.96 | 370% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.86 | 54.05 | 181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement