Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WWSCX
FSSNX vs WWSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WWSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$30.79
Change-$0.18 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.42B
Keeley Small Cap Fund C
Price$18.21
Change+$0.33 (+1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.12M
FSSNX vs WWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WWSCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WWSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 28.4B vs. WWSCX (69.1M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WWSCX: FSSNX (0.82) vs WWSCX (0.05). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WWSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WWSCX (24 years). WWSCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). WWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWSCX: FSSNX (0) vs WWSCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.40 vs. WWSCX (-14.20). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 59.82 vs. WWSCX (35.41).
| FSSNX | WWSCX | FSSNX / WWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.00 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.33 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.236 | 5.611 | 200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4B | 69.1M | 41,100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.05 | 1,692% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.40 | -14.20 | -66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.66 | 7.18 | 664% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.82 | 35.41 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.27 | 3.53 | 3,041% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers