Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSST vs RECS
FSST vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FSST vs RECS
Fidelity Sustainable U.S. Equity ETF
Price$29.15
Change-$0.10 (-0.34%)
Volume$718
Net Assets16.78M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$39.05
Change-$0.15 (-0.38%)
Volume$1.91M
Net Assets3.57B
FSST vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSST vs. RECS commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSST is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.57B vs. FSST (16.8M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FSST: RECS (12.796) vs FSST (8.810). FSST was incepted earlier than RECS: FSST (4 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FSST (0.59). FSST has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| FSST | RECS | FSST / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 8.810 | 12.796 | 69% |
| Net Assets | 16.8M | 3.57B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.15 | 393% |
| Turnover | 52.00 | 49.00 | 106% |
| Yield | 0.37 | 0.62 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FSST | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 6 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FSST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FSST and GEN have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSST and GEN's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSST | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| GEN - FSST | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| DIS - FSST | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
| NEE - FSST | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
| FNV - FSST | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.98% | ||
| ZTS - FSST | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||