Ad is loading...
FSTA vs FTXG
FSTA vs FTXG Comparison
Open Charts FSTA vs FTXG
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples ETF
Price$51.25
Change-$0.19 (-0.37%)
Volume$1.25K
Net Assets1.35B
First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF
Price$22.85
Change+$0.20 (+0.88%)
Volume$100
Net Assets35.14M
FSTA vs FTXG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTA vs. FTXG commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTA is a Buy and FTXG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSTA has more net assets: 1.35B vs. FTXG (35.1M). FSTA has a higher annual dividend yield than FTXG: FSTA (4.649) vs FTXG (-1.285). FSTA was incepted earlier than FTXG: FSTA (12 years) vs FTXG (9 years). FSTA (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FTXG (0.60). FTXG has a higher turnover FSTA (8.00) vs FSTA (8.00).
| FSTA | FTXG | FSTA / FTXG | |
| Gain YTD | 4.649 | -1.285 | -362% |
| Net Assets | 1.35B | 35.1M | 3,849% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.60 | 14% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 13.00 | 62% |
| Yield | 2.15 | 2.76 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FSTA | FTXG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 9 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FSTA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSTA has been closely correlated with KO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSTA jumps, then KO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSTA | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| KO - FSTA | 73% Closely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| PEP - FSTA | 71% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| MDLZ - FSTA | 69% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| CL - FSTA | 66% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| PG - FSTA | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
More | ||||
FTXG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTXG has been closely correlated with MDLZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTXG jumps, then MDLZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTXG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTXG | 100% | -0.22% | ||
| MDLZ - FTXG | 76% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| PEP - FTXG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| KHC - FTXG | 72% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| KO - FTXG | 71% Closely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| CAG - FTXG | 69% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
More | ||||