Ad is loading...
FSTA vs FXG
FSTA vs FXG Comparison
Open Charts FSTA vs FXG
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples ETF
Price$51.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$416.37K
Net Assets1.29B
First Trust Cnsmr Staples AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$65.64
Change+$1.60 (+2.50%)
Volume$57.09K
Net Assets292.04M
FSTA vs FXG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTA vs. FXG commentary
Mar 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTA is a Hold and FXG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSTA has more net assets: 1.29B vs. FXG (292M). FSTA has a higher annual dividend yield than FXG: FSTA (5.078) vs FXG (2.465). FSTA was incepted earlier than FXG: FSTA (11 years) vs FXG (18 years). FSTA (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FXG (0.62). FXG has a higher turnover FSTA (8.00) vs FSTA (8.00).
| FSTA | FXG | FSTA / FXG | |
| Gain YTD | 5.078 | 2.465 | 206% |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 292M | 443% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.62 | 14% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 67.00 | 12% |
| Yield | 2.12 | 1.67 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FSTA | FXG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FSTA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSTA has been closely correlated with KO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSTA jumps, then KO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSTA | 100% | N/A | ||
| KO - FSTA | 73% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| PEP - FSTA | 71% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| MDLZ - FSTA | 69% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| CL - FSTA | 66% Closely correlated | +3.70% | ||
| PG - FSTA | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
More | ||||
FXG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FXG has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FXG jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y