Ad is loading...
FSTSX vs ISCCX
FSTSX vs ISCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTSX vs ISCCX
Fidelity Series International Sm Cap
Price$16.81
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.78B
Federated Hermes Intl Small-Mid Co C
Price$28.29
Change+$0.13 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets282.16M
FSTSX vs ISCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTSX vs. ISCCX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTSX is a Hold and ISCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSTSX has more cash in the bank: 3.78B vs. ISCCX (282M). FSTSX pays higher dividends than ISCCX: FSTSX (3.08) vs ISCCX (1.11). FSTSX was incepted earlier than ISCCX: FSTSX (15 years) vs ISCCX (29 years). ISCCX (2.30) is less costly to investors than FSTSX (0.02). ISCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSTSX (30.00). FSTSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ISCCX: FSTSX (0) vs ISCCX (1500). ISCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.55 vs. FSTSX (-0.25). ISCCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.54 vs. FSTSX (44.95).
| FSTSX | ISCCX | FSTSX / ISCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.02 | 1.99 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.02 | 2.30 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.642 | 8.391 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.78B | 282M | 1,340% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 1.11 | 279% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.25 | 8.55 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.31 | 11.16 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.95 | 52.54 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.31 | -10.95 | -167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...