Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTSX vs ISCCX
FSTSX vs ISCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTSX vs ISCCX
Fidelity Series International Sm Cap
Price$19.59
Change+$0.25 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.75B
Federated Hermes Intl Small-Mid Co C
Price$32.84
Change+$0.48 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.84M
FSTSX vs ISCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTSX vs. ISCCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTSX is a StrongBuy and ISCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSTSX has more cash in the bank: 3.75B vs. ISCCX (336M). FSTSX pays higher dividends than ISCCX: FSTSX (2.77) vs ISCCX (0.98). FSTSX was incepted earlier than ISCCX: FSTSX (16 years) vs ISCCX (29 years). ISCCX (2.30) is less costly to investors than FSTSX (0.02). ISCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSTSX (30.00). FSTSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ISCCX: FSTSX (0) vs ISCCX (1500). ISCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.74 vs. FSTSX (17.13). FSTSX return over 5 years is better than : 33.27 vs. ISCCX (31.38).
| FSTSX | ISCCX | FSTSX / ISCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.02 | 1.99 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.02 | 2.30 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.383 | 24.557 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.75B | 336M | 1,116% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 0.98 | 283% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.13 | 25.74 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.48 | 51.40 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.27 | 31.38 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.41 | -1.41 | -2,295% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement