FSUGY
Price
$24.70
Change
-$0.74 (-2.91%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
38.02B
FTMDF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
30.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSUGY vs FTMDF

Header iconFSUGY vs FTMDF Comparison
Open Charts FSUGY vs FTMDFBanner chart's image
FORTESCUE
Price$24.70
Change-$0.74 (-2.91%)
Volume$79.91K
Capitalization38.02B
Fortune Minerals
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$440.5K
Capitalization30.43M
FSUGY vs FTMDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSUGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSUGY vs. FTMDF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSUGY is a Hold and FTMDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FSUGY: $24.70 vs. FTMDF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: FSUGY and FTMDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSUGY: 106% vs. FTMDF: 618%
Market capitalization -- FSUGY: $38.02B vs. FTMDF: $30.43M
FSUGY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $38.02B. FTMDF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $30.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSUGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFTMDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSUGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FTMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSUGY is a better buy in the long-term than FTMDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSUGY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTMDF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSUGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FTMDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSUGY is a better buy in the short-term than FTMDF.

Price Growth

FSUGY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.11% price change this week, while FTMDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -9.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUGY($38B) has a higher market cap than FTMDF($30.4M). FTMDF YTD gains are higher at: 45.014 vs. FSUGY (16.512). FSUGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.56B vs. FTMDF (-2.75M). FSUGY has more cash in the bank: 2.31B vs. FTMDF (1.09M). FTMDF has less debt than FSUGY: FTMDF (12.6M) vs FSUGY (5.44B). FSUGY has higher revenues than FTMDF: FSUGY (15.4B) vs FTMDF (0).
FSUGYFTMDFFSUGY / FTMDF
Capitalization38B30.4M125,000%
EBITDA7.56B-2.75M-274,818%
Gain YTD16.51245.01437%
P/E Ratio11.26N/A-
Revenue15.4B0-
Total Cash2.31B1.09M211,619%
Total Debt5.44B12.6M43,167%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSUGY vs FTMDF: Fundamental Ratings
FSUGY
FTMDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2255
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62100
SMR RATING
1..100
9395
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1151
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSUGY's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FTMDF (95). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew significantly faster than FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTMDF (100). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as FTMDF (95). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew similarly to FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FSUGY (44). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew similarly to FSUGY’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTMDF (51). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSUGYFTMDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSUGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAPNU10.45N/A
N/A
Cayson Acquisition Corp
FSV201.58-0.54
-0.27%
FirstService Corp
NEUE6.68-0.05
-0.74%
NeueHealth
SHCO8.85-0.07
-0.78%
Soho House & Co
VSTA4.54-0.06
-1.30%
Vasta Platform Limited

FSUGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUGY has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSUGY jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUGY
1D Price
Change %
FSUGY100%
+0.15%
BHP - FSUGY
73%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
RIO - FSUGY
72%
Closely correlated
+2.42%
FSUMF - FSUGY
68%
Closely correlated
N/A
VALE - FSUGY
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
GLNCY - FSUGY
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
More

FTMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTMDF and KCCFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTMDF and KCCFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTMDF
1D Price
Change %
FTMDF100%
-5.04%
KCCFF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
AGXPF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+12.07%
FSUGY - FTMDF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
GARWF - FTMDF
8%
Poorly correlated
+4.23%
FWEDF - FTMDF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
More