FSUGY
Price
$26.11
Change
+$0.53 (+2.07%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
40.43B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
GCCFF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.75M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSUGY vs GCCFF

Header iconFSUGY vs GCCFF Comparison
Open Charts FSUGY vs GCCFFBanner chart's image
FORTESCUE
Price$26.11
Change+$0.53 (+2.07%)
Volume$32.96K
Capitalization40.43B
Golden Cariboo Resources
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$52.1K
Capitalization3.75M
FSUGY vs GCCFF Comparison Chart in %
FSUGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSUGY vs. GCCFF commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSUGY is a Buy and GCCFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FSUGY: $26.11 vs. GCCFF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: FSUGY and GCCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSUGY: 78% vs. GCCFF: 140%
Market capitalization -- FSUGY: $40.43B vs. GCCFF: $3.75M
FSUGY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $40.43B. GCCFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $3.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSUGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGCCFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSUGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GCCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSUGY is a better buy in the long-term than GCCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSUGY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCCFF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSUGY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GCCFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GCCFF is a better buy in the short-term than FSUGY.

Price Growth

FSUGY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +6.22% price change this week, while GCCFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -2.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +253.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.05% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUGY($40.4B) has a higher market cap than GCCFF($3.75M). FSUGY YTD gains are higher at: 23.192 vs. GCCFF (-58.853). FSUGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.56B vs. GCCFF (-5.38M). FSUGY has more cash in the bank: 2.31B vs. GCCFF (337K). FSUGY has higher revenues than GCCFF: FSUGY (15.4B) vs GCCFF (0).
FSUGYGCCFFFSUGY / GCCFF
Capitalization40.4B3.75M1,076,185%
EBITDA7.56B-5.38M-140,386%
Gain YTD23.192-58.853-39%
P/E Ratio11.90N/A-
Revenue15.4B0-
Total Cash2.31B337K686,350%
Total Debt5.44BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSUGY vs GCCFF: Fundamental Ratings
FSUGY
GCCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7069
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55100
SMR RATING
1..100
94100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4691
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1095
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSUGY's Valuation (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCCFF (49). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCCFF (100). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as GCCFF (100). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew similarly to GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCCFF (91). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GCCFF (95). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew significantly faster than GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSUGYGCCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSUGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VLYPO25.000.14
+0.54%
Valley National Bancorp
ADEA16.56-0.05
-0.30%
Adeia
UHAL55.48-0.44
-0.79%
U-Haul Holding Company
FORA2.12-0.06
-2.75%
Forian
IONR5.33-0.49
-8.42%
ioneer Ltd

FSUGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUGY has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSUGY jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUGY
1D Price
Change %
FSUGY100%
+2.06%
BHP - FSUGY
73%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
RIO - FSUGY
72%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
FSUMF - FSUGY
68%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
VALE - FSUGY
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
GLNCY - FSUGY
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
More

GCCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCCFF and CTJHY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCCFF and CTJHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCCFF
1D Price
Change %
GCCFF100%
+6.51%
CTJHY - GCCFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARWF - GCCFF
5%
Poorly correlated
-14.25%
FTMDF - GCCFF
2%
Poorly correlated
-8.86%
FWEDF - GCCFF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.16%
FSUGY - GCCFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
More