FSUGY
Price
$24.82
Change
+$0.18 (+0.73%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
37B
MJDLF
Price
$7.33
Change
+$0.21 (+2.95%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
599.76M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSUGY vs MJDLF

Header iconFSUGY vs MJDLF Comparison
Open Charts FSUGY vs MJDLFBanner chart's image
FORTESCUE
Price$24.82
Change+$0.18 (+0.73%)
Volume$39.41K
Capitalization37B
Major Drilling Group International
Price$7.33
Change+$0.21 (+2.95%)
Volume$9.25K
Capitalization599.76M
FSUGY vs MJDLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSUGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSUGY vs. MJDLF commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSUGY is a Hold and MJDLF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FSUGY: $24.82 vs. MJDLF: $7.33)
Brand notoriety: FSUGY and MJDLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSUGY: 74% vs. MJDLF: 66%
Market capitalization -- FSUGY: $37B vs. MJDLF: $599.76M
FSUGY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $37B. MJDLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $599.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSUGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMJDLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSUGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MJDLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSUGY is a better buy in the long-term than MJDLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSUGY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MJDLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSUGY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MJDLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MJDLF is a better buy in the short-term than FSUGY.

Price Growth

FSUGY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.52% price change this week, while MJDLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +10.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.32%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.56% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUGY($37B) has a higher market cap than MJDLF($600M). MJDLF has higher P/E ratio than FSUGY: MJDLF (31.49) vs FSUGY (11.31). MJDLF YTD gains are higher at: 29.505 vs. FSUGY (13.498). MJDLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 103M vs. FSUGY (-6.13M). MJDLF has more cash in the bank: 46M vs. FSUGY (2.58M). MJDLF (37.1M) and FSUGY (38.3M) have identical debt. MJDLF has higher revenues than FSUGY: MJDLF (728M) vs FSUGY (1.28M).
FSUGYMJDLFFSUGY / MJDLF
Capitalization37B600M6,167%
EBITDA-6.13M103M-6%
Gain YTD13.49829.50546%
P/E Ratio11.3131.4936%
Revenue1.28M728M0%
Total Cash2.58M46M6%
Total Debt38.3M37.1M103%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSUGY vs MJDLF: Fundamental Ratings
FSUGY
MJDLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1712
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6468
SMR RATING
1..100
6685
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
118
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSUGY's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MJDLF (78). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew significantly faster than MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as MJDLF (68). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew similarly to MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as MJDLF (85). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew similarly to MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as FSUGY (45). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew similarly to FSUGY’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as FSUGY (11). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew similarly to FSUGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSUGYMJDLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSUGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FOSKX72.79N/A
N/A
Fidelity Overseas K
GGRUX14.87N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth R6
HCMNX20.30N/A
N/A
HCM Sector Plus A
VTAIX11.11N/A
N/A
Virtus Tactical Allocation I
WSMVX27.90-0.09
-0.32%
Wilshire Small Company Value Instl

FSUGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUGY has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSUGY jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUGY
1D Price
Change %
FSUGY100%
+0.73%
BHP - FSUGY
73%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
RIO - FSUGY
72%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
FSUMF - FSUGY
68%
Closely correlated
N/A
VALE - FSUGY
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
GLNCY - FSUGY
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
More