Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWFX vs HGXCX
FSWFX vs HGXCX Comparison
Open Charts FSWFX vs HGXCX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529-F-2
Price$74.15
Change+$0.37 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.4B
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$16.43
Change+$0.08 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.17M
FSWFX vs HGXCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSWFX has more cash in the bank: 79.4B vs. HGXCX (299M). FSWFX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: FSWFX (0.85) vs HGXCX (0.00). FSWFX was incepted earlier than HGXCX: FSWFX (5 years) vs HGXCX (8 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FSWFX (0.76). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FSWFX (32.00). FSWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: FSWFX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). HGXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.54 vs. FSWFX (10.12).
| FSWFX | HGXCX | FSWFX / HGXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.94 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.99 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.708 | 9.365 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.4B | 299M | 26,555% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.12 | 13.54 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.81 | 30.49 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 40.58 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement