Ad is loading...
FSWFX vs HGXCX
FSWFX vs HGXCX Comparison
Open Charts FSWFX vs HGXCX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529-F-2
Price$61.56
Change+$0.57 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.08B
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$14.36
Change+$0.12 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.43M
FSWFX vs HGXCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSWFX has more cash in the bank: 66.1B vs. HGXCX (244M). FSWFX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: FSWFX (0.94) vs HGXCX (0.00). FSWFX was incepted earlier than HGXCX: FSWFX (4 years) vs HGXCX (8 years). HGXCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FSWFX (0.76). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FSWFX (32.00). FSWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: FSWFX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). HGXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.11 vs. FSWFX (-3.74).
| FSWFX | HGXCX | FSWFX / HGXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.94 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 2.01 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.948 | -4.749 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66.1B | 244M | 27,090% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.74 | 6.11 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.50 | 0.56 | -619% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 49.27 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...