Ad is loading...
FSWFX vs HGXCX
FSWFX vs HGXCX Comparison
Open Charts FSWFX vs HGXCX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529-F-2
Price$66.47
Change+$0.21 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.85B
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$15.48
Change+$0.17 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.89M
FSWFX vs HGXCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSWFX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. HGXCX (268M). FSWFX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: FSWFX (0.92) vs HGXCX (0.00). FSWFX was incepted earlier than HGXCX: FSWFX (5 years) vs HGXCX (8 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FSWFX (0.76). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FSWFX (32.00). FSWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: FSWFX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). HGXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.80 vs. FSWFX (-0.13).
| FSWFX | HGXCX | FSWFX / HGXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.94 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.99 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.686 | 3.545 | -48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.8B | 268M | 26,791% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.13 | 7.80 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.51 | 25.45 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 58.93 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...