Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWFX vs HGXIX
FSWFX vs HGXIX Comparison
Open Charts FSWFX vs HGXIX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529-F-2
Price$73.14
Change-$0.38 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.93B
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$16.43
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.09M
FSWFX vs HGXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSWFX has more cash in the bank: 78.9B vs. HGXIX (313M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than FSWFX: HGXIX (0.89) vs FSWFX (0.81). FSWFX was incepted earlier than HGXIX: FSWFX (5 years) vs HGXIX (9 years). HGXIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FSWFX (0.76). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FSWFX (32.00). FSWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: FSWFX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). FSWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.68 vs. HGXIX (5.53). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 18.91 vs. FSWFX (3.40).
| FSWFX | HGXIX | FSWFX / HGXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.87 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.87 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.214 | 6.697 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 78.9B | 313M | 25,208% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.89 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.68 | 5.53 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.22 | 28.31 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.40 | 18.91 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers