Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWFX vs HGXRX
FSWFX vs HGXRX Comparison
Open Charts FSWFX vs HGXRX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529-F-2
Price$73.27
Change+$0.13 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.93B
Hartford Global Impact R3
Price$16.12
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.65M
FSWFX vs HGXRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSWFX has more cash in the bank: 78.9B vs. HGXRX (314M). FSWFX pays higher dividends than HGXRX: FSWFX (0.81) vs HGXRX (0.41). FSWFX was incepted earlier than HGXRX: FSWFX (5 years) vs HGXRX (9 years). HGXRX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FSWFX (0.76). HGXRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FSWFX (32.00). HGXRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSWFX: HGXRX (0) vs FSWFX (250). FSWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. HGXRX (4.87). HGXRX return over 5 years is better than : 15.89 vs. FSWFX (3.11).
| FSWFX | HGXRX | FSWFX / HGXRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.41 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.46 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.406 | 6.324 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 78.9B | 314M | 25,127% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.41 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | 4.87 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.45 | 26.48 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.11 | 15.89 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement