Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSYBX vs RBEKX
FSYBX vs RBEKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEKX has more cash in the bank: 46.4B vs. FSYBX (10.3M). FSYBX pays higher dividends than RBEKX: FSYBX (1.30) vs RBEKX (0.82). FSYBX was incepted earlier than RBEKX: FSYBX (2 years) vs RBEKX (11 years). RBEKX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FSYBX (0.49). FSYBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RBEKX (6.00). FSYBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBEKX: FSYBX (0) vs RBEKX (250). RBEKX (11.04) and FSYBX (10.55) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FSYBX | RBEKX | FSYBX / RBEKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.16 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.16 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.752 | 6.147 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3M | 46.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.82 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.55 | 11.04 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 24.37 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 36.93 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.39 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement