Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSYBX vs RCKTX
FSYBX vs RCKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCKTX has more cash in the bank: 46.4B vs. FSYBX (10.3M). FSYBX pays higher dividends than RCKTX: FSYBX (1.30) vs RCKTX (0.93). FSYBX was incepted earlier than RCKTX: FSYBX (2 years) vs RCKTX (18 years). RCKTX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FSYBX (0.49). FSYBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RCKTX (6.00). FSYBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCKTX: FSYBX (0) vs RCKTX (250). RCKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.19 vs. FSYBX (10.55).
| FSYBX | RCKTX | FSYBX / RCKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.00 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.00 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.752 | 6.200 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3M | 46.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.93 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.55 | 11.19 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 24.81 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 37.70 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement