Ad is loading...
FSYBX vs RCKTX
FSYBX vs RCKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCKTX has more cash in the bank: 43.6B vs. FSYBX (7.78M). FSYBX pays higher dividends than RCKTX: FSYBX (1.37) vs RCKTX (0.98). FSYBX was incepted earlier than RCKTX: FSYBX (2 years) vs RCKTX (18 years). RCKTX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FSYBX (0.49). FSYBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RCKTX (6.00). FSYBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCKTX: FSYBX (0) vs RCKTX (250). FSYBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.23 vs. RCKTX (6.62).
| FSYBX | RCKTX | FSYBX / RCKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.00 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.00 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.329 | -0.992 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.78M | 43.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.98 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.23 | 6.62 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 15.96 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 43.55 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...