Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAAX vs HBLRX
FTAAX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FTAAX vs HBLRX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% A
Price$12.82
Change+$0.06 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
Hartford Balanced Income R3
Price$15.20
Change+$0.08 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.81B
FTAAX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAAX vs. HBLRX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAAX is a StrongBuy and HBLRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. FTAAX (2.03B). HBLRX pays higher dividends than FTAAX: HBLRX (2.89) vs FTAAX (2.59). FTAAX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FTAAX (18 years) vs HBLRX (15 years). HBLRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FTAAX (0.79). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTAAX (19.00). FTAAX (0) and HBLRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.00 vs. HBLRX (1.71). FTAAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.42 vs. HBLRX (14.95).
| FTAAX | HBLRX | FTAAX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.28 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.28 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.738 | 8.426 | 116% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 11.8B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 2.89 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.00 | 1.71 | 467% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.95 | 23.62 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.42 | 14.95 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.54 | 38.85 | 112% |