Ad is loading...
FTAAX vs JNBAX
FTAAX vs JNBAX Comparison
Open Charts FTAAX vs JNBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% A
Price$11.88
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
JPMorgan Income Builder A
Price$9.73
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
FTAAX vs JNBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAAX vs. JNBAX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAAX is a Buy and JNBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNBAX has more cash in the bank: 7.99B vs. FTAAX (1.95B). JNBAX pays higher dividends than FTAAX: JNBAX (5.76) vs FTAAX (2.73). FTAAX was incepted earlier than JNBAX: FTAAX (18 years) vs JNBAX (18 years). JNBAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FTAAX (0.79). JNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. FTAAX (22.00). FTAAX initial investment is less costly to investors than JNBAX (5%) vs JNBAX (5%). FTAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNBAX: FTAAX (0) vs JNBAX (1000). JNBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.47 vs. FTAAX (6.06). JNBAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.35 vs. FTAAX (18.29).
| FTAAX | JNBAX | FTAAX / JNBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.75 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.05 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.539 | 1.099 | 49% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 128% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 7.99B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 5.76 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.06 | 8.47 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.98 | 11.66 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.29 | 25.35 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.02 | 38.32 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...