Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTASX vs RIDBX
FTASX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FTASX vs RIDBX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% M
Price$30.47
Change+$0.09 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.15B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$26.79
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.58B
FTASX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTASX vs. RIDBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTASX is a StrongBuy and RIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. FTASX (7.15B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FTASX: RIDBX (3.02) vs FTASX (1.19). FTASX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FTASX (17 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). RIDBX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FTASX (1.18). RIDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FTASX (14.00). FTASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FTASX (0) vs RIDBX (250). RIDBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.78 vs. FTASX (8.88). RIDBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. FTASX (31.99).
| FTASX | RIDBX | FTASX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.36 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.36 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.364 | 12.556 | 91% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.15B | 137B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 3.02 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 9.78 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.88 | 24.26 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.99 | 33.65 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.14 | 51.85 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement