Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTASX vs RIDBX
FTASX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FTASX vs RIDBX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% M
Price$29.95
Change+$0.11 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.15B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$26.32
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.7B
FTASX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTASX vs. RIDBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTASX is a Buy and RIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FTASX (7.15B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FTASX: RIDBX (3.02) vs FTASX (1.19). FTASX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FTASX (17 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). RIDBX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FTASX (1.18). RIDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FTASX (14.00). FTASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FTASX (0) vs RIDBX (250). RIDBX (13.34) and FTASX (12.94) have marching annual gain over last year. RIDBX (33.23) and FTASX (33.04) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTASX | RIDBX | FTASX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.36 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.36 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.384 | 10.581 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.15B | 135B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 3.02 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.94 | 13.34 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.57 | 20.88 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.04 | 33.23 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.10 | 41.98 | 129% |