Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTASX vs RIDBX
FTASX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FTASX vs RIDBX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% M
Price$28.69
Change+$0.12 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.85B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$25.85
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.88B
FTASX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTASX vs. RIDBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTASX is a StrongBuy and RIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. FTASX (6.85B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FTASX: RIDBX (3.08) vs FTASX (1.25). FTASX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FTASX (17 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). RIDBX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FTASX (1.18). RIDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FTASX (14.00). FTASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FTASX (0) vs RIDBX (250). RIDBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.71 vs. FTASX (5.64). FTASX (33.60) and RIDBX (32.30) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTASX | RIDBX | FTASX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.36 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.36 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.729 | 8.095 | 58% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.85B | 132B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 3.08 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.64 | 11.71 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.01 | 13.19 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.60 | 32.30 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.39 | 37.60 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement