Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTASX vs RIDBX
FTASX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FTASX vs RIDBX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% M
Price$29.65
Change+$0.15 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.11B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$26.30
Change+$0.07 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.4B
FTASX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTASX vs. RIDBX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTASX is a Buy and RIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. FTASX (7.11B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FTASX: RIDBX (3.00) vs FTASX (1.20). FTASX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FTASX (17 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). RIDBX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FTASX (1.18). RIDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FTASX (14.00). FTASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FTASX (0) vs RIDBX (250). RIDBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.49 vs. FTASX (6.37). RIDBX (36.23) and FTASX (35.13) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTASX | RIDBX | FTASX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.36 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.36 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.138 | 10.497 | 78% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.11B | 134B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 3.00 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 10.49 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.81 | 25.32 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.13 | 36.23 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.86 | 40.68 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers