Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTASX vs RIDBX
FTASX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FTASX vs RIDBX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% M
Price$31.04
Change-$0.21 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.69B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$26.89
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.8B
FTASX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTASX vs. RIDBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTASX is a Hold and RIDBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. FTASX (7.69B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FTASX: RIDBX (2.92) vs FTASX (1.11). FTASX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FTASX (17 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). RIDBX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FTASX (1.18). FTASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FTASX (0) vs RIDBX (250). FTASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.59 vs. RIDBX (9.01). RIDBX (31.24) and FTASX (31.02) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTASX | RIDBX | FTASX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.35 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.35 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.553 | 13.466 | 108% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.69B | 138B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 2.92 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.59 | 9.01 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.11 | 25.50 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.02 | 31.24 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.68 | 47.81 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers