Ad is loading...
FTASX vs RIDBX
FTASX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FTASX vs RIDBX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% M
Price$26.25
Change+$1.44 (+5.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.67B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$23.93
Change+$0.88 (+3.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets118.26B
FTASX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTASX vs. RIDBX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTASX is a Buy and RIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FTASX (6.67B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FTASX: RIDBX (3.16) vs FTASX (1.30). FTASX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FTASX (17 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). RIDBX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FTASX (1.18). RIDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FTASX (19.00). FTASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FTASX (0) vs RIDBX (250). RIDBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.23 vs. FTASX (-7.11). FTASX return over 5 years is better than : 30.68 vs. RIDBX (27.03).
| FTASX | RIDBX | FTASX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.36 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.36 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.054 | -3.614 | 251% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.67B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 3.16 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.11 | 0.23 | -3,025% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.77 | -1.40 | 270% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.68 | 27.03 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.27 | 20.32 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...