Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTASX vs RIDBX
FTASX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FTASX vs RIDBX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% M
Price$31.29
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.54B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$27.06
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.61B
FTASX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTASX vs. RIDBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTASX is a Hold and RIDBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FTASX (7.54B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FTASX: RIDBX (2.90) vs FTASX (1.13). FTASX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FTASX (17 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). RIDBX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FTASX (1.18). FTASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FTASX (0) vs RIDBX (250). FTASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.66 vs. RIDBX (8.21). RIDBX (36.27) and FTASX (35.41) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTASX | RIDBX | FTASX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.35 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.35 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.626 | 14.099 | 104% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.54B | 139B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 2.90 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.66 | 8.21 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.73 | 34.79 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.41 | 36.27 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.81 | 50.59 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement