Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTASX vs RIDBX
FTASX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FTASX vs RIDBX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% M
Price$30.99
Change-$0.07 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.29B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$26.99
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.85B
FTASX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTASX vs. RIDBX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTASX is a StrongBuy and RIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. FTASX (7.3B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FTASX: RIDBX (2.94) vs FTASX (1.17). FTASX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FTASX (17 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). RIDBX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FTASX (1.18). RIDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FTASX (14.00). FTASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FTASX (0) vs RIDBX (250). FTASX (10.83) and RIDBX (10.50) have marching annual gain over last year. FTASX (37.70) and RIDBX (37.58) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTASX | RIDBX | FTASX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.36 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.36 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.600 | 13.888 | 98% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.3B | 138B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 2.94 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.83 | 10.50 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.34 | 29.19 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.70 | 37.58 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.15 | 54.99 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement