Ad is loading...
FTASX vs RIDCX
FTASX vs RIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FTASX vs RIDCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% M
Price$26.25
Change+$1.44 (+5.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.67B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R3
Price$24.19
Change+$0.89 (+3.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets118.26B
FTASX vs RIDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTASX vs. RIDCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTASX is a Buy and RIDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FTASX (6.67B). RIDCX pays higher dividends than FTASX: RIDCX (3.55) vs FTASX (1.30). FTASX was incepted earlier than RIDCX: FTASX (17 years) vs RIDCX (23 years). FTASX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RIDCX (0.91). RIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FTASX (19.00). FTASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDCX: FTASX (0) vs RIDCX (250). RIDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.66 vs. FTASX (-7.11). FTASX (30.68) and RIDCX (29.29) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTASX | RIDCX | FTASX / RIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.054 | -3.552 | 255% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.67B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 3.55 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.11 | 0.66 | -1,069% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.77 | -0.27 | 1,398% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.68 | 29.29 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.27 | 23.24 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...