Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAWX vs MXIPX
FTAWX vs MXIPX Comparison
Open Charts FTAWX vs MXIPX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% A
Price$14.09
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.49B
Empower Conservative Profile L
Price$9.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
FTAWX vs MXIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAWX vs. MXIPX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAWX is a Buy and MXIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTAWX has more cash in the bank: 5.49B vs. MXIPX (1.46B). FTAWX pays higher dividends than MXIPX: FTAWX (2.96) vs MXIPX (2.02). FTAWX was incepted earlier than MXIPX: FTAWX (19 years) vs MXIPX (14 years). MXIPX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FTAWX (0.77). MXIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FTAWX (24.00). FTAWX (0) and MXIPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTAWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.13 vs. MXIPX (4.17). FTAWX return over 5 years is better than : 12.38 vs. MXIPX (10.28).
| FTAWX | MXIPX | FTAWX / MXIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.02 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.10 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.837 | 5.114 | 114% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.49B | 1.46B | 376% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 2.02 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.13 | 4.17 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.46 | 8.38 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.38 | 10.28 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.94 | 18.93 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement