Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAWX vs MXIPX
FTAWX vs MXIPX Comparison
Open Charts FTAWX vs MXIPX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% A
Price$14.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.61B
Empower Conservative Profile L
Price$9.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
FTAWX vs MXIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAWX vs. MXIPX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAWX is a Hold and MXIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTAWX has more cash in the bank: 5.61B vs. MXIPX (1.59B). FTAWX pays higher dividends than MXIPX: FTAWX (2.86) vs MXIPX (2.00). FTAWX was incepted earlier than MXIPX: FTAWX (19 years) vs MXIPX (14 years). MXIPX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FTAWX (0.77). MXIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FTAWX (24.00). FTAWX (0) and MXIPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTAWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.29 vs. MXIPX (5.27). FTAWX return over 5 years is better than : 11.95 vs. MXIPX (8.53).
| FTAWX | MXIPX | FTAWX / MXIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.01 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.09 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.858 | 6.223 | 126% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.61B | 1.59B | 352% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.86 | 2.00 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.29 | 5.27 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.67 | 16.23 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.95 | 8.53 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.03 | 22.42 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement