Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAZX vs MDXBX
FTAZX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts FTAZX vs MDXBX
Franklin AZ Tax Free Income A1
Price$9.45
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets655.05M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.77
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
FTAZX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAZX vs. MDXBX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAZX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. FTAZX (655M). MDXBX (3.44) and FTAZX (3.31) have matching dividends . FTAZX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: FTAZX (38 years) vs MDXBX (38 years). FTAZX (0.67) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MDXBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.30 vs. FTAZX (10.60). FTAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDXBX: FTAZX (1000) vs MDXBX (2500). MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.08 vs. FTAZX (-0.85). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 2.62 vs. FTAZX (-4.29).
| FTAZX | MDXBX | FTAZX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.49 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.53 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.344 | -1.777 | 132% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 655M | 2.27B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 3.44 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.85 | -0.08 | 1,043% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.76 | 7.95 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.29 | 2.62 | -164% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.04 | 13.01 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement