Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAZX vs MDXBX
FTAZX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts FTAZX vs MDXBX
Franklin AZ Tax Free Income A1
Price$9.71
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets647.88M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$10.03
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.34B
FTAZX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAZX vs. MDXBX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAZX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.34B vs. FTAZX (648M). MDXBX (3.50) and FTAZX (3.35) have matching dividends . FTAZX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: FTAZX (38 years) vs MDXBX (39 years). FTAZX (0.67) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MDXBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.30 vs. FTAZX (10.60). FTAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDXBX: FTAZX (1000) vs MDXBX (2500). MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.47 vs. FTAZX (1.05). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 5.55 vs. FTAZX (-1.02).
| FTAZX | MDXBX | FTAZX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.49 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.53 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.545 | 2.061 | 75% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 648M | 2.34B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.35 | 3.50 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.05 | 1.47 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.11 | 12.98 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.02 | 5.55 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.52 | 16.99 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement