Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTAZX vs TFBIX
FTAZX vs TFBIX Comparison
Open Charts FTAZX vs TFBIX
Franklin AZ Tax Free Income A1
Price$9.45
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets655.05M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond I
Price$9.77
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
FTAZX vs TFBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTAZX vs. TFBIX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTAZX is a Hold and TFBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBIX has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. FTAZX (655M). TFBIX pays higher dividends than FTAZX: TFBIX (3.52) vs FTAZX (3.31). FTAZX was incepted earlier than TFBIX: FTAZX (38 years) vs TFBIX (8 years). FTAZX (0.67) is less costly to investors than TFBIX (0.41). TFBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.30 vs. FTAZX (10.60). FTAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBIX: FTAZX (1000) vs TFBIX (500000). TFBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.09 vs. FTAZX (-0.85). TFBIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.07 vs. FTAZX (-4.29).
| FTAZX | TFBIX | FTAZX / TFBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.41 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.41 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.344 | -1.647 | 142% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 655M | 2.27B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 3.52 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.85 | 0.09 | -897% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.76 | 8.30 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.29 | 3.07 | -140% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers