Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTCOX vs RGWBX
FTCOX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FTCOX vs RGWBX
Franklin Corefolio Allocation A
Price$23.28
Change-$0.34 (-1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$26.65
Change-$0.40 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.17B
FTCOX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTCOX vs. RGWBX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTCOX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 23.2B vs. FTCOX (1B). FTCOX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FTCOX (0.69) vs RGWBX (0.00). FTCOX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FTCOX (22 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FTCOX (1.01). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTCOX: RGWBX (250) vs FTCOX (1000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.32 vs. FTCOX (4.96). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.67 vs. FTCOX (25.47).
| FTCOX | RGWBX | FTCOX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.46 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.46 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.135 | 9.491 | 22% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1B | 23.2B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.96 | 11.32 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.54 | 33.77 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.47 | 35.67 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.07 | 70.22 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement