Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTCOX vs RGWBX
FTCOX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FTCOX vs RGWBX
Franklin Corefolio Allocation A
Price$23.68
Change+$0.17 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$26.91
Change+$0.23 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.99B
FTCOX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTCOX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTCOX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 23B vs. FTCOX (1.03B). FTCOX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FTCOX (0.69) vs RGWBX (0.00). FTCOX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FTCOX (22 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FTCOX (1.01). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTCOX: RGWBX (250) vs FTCOX (1000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.15 vs. FTCOX (4.12). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 41.98 vs. FTCOX (30.89).
| FTCOX | RGWBX | FTCOX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.46 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.46 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.394 | 10.559 | 23% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 23B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.12 | 10.15 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.28 | 44.88 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.89 | 41.98 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.55 | 73.32 | 48% |