Ad is loading...
FTCOX vs RGWBX
FTCOX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FTCOX vs RGWBX
Franklin Corefolio Allocation A
Price$23.70
Change+$0.18 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$24.95
Change+$0.21 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.01B
FTCOX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTCOX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTCOX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 21B vs. FTCOX (1.01B). FTCOX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FTCOX (0.48) vs RGWBX (0.08). FTCOX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FTCOX (21 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). FTCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 6.51 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTCOX: RGWBX (250) vs FTCOX (1000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.86 vs. FTCOX (12.19). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 29.12 vs. FTCOX (17.41).
| FTCOX | RGWBX | FTCOX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.464 | 2.506 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 21B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.08 | 607% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.19 | 16.86 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.39 | 4.57 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.41 | 29.12 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.09 | 69.87 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers