Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTCOX vs RGWBX
FTCOX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FTCOX vs RGWBX
Franklin Corefolio Allocation A
Price$23.93
Change+$0.08 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets998.35M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$27.99
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.04B
FTCOX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTCOX vs. RGWBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTCOX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. FTCOX (998M). FTCOX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FTCOX (0.66) vs RGWBX (0.00). FTCOX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FTCOX (22 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FTCOX (1.01). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTCOX: RGWBX (250) vs FTCOX (1000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.00 vs. FTCOX (-0.39). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 29.04 vs. FTCOX (14.78).
| FTCOX | RGWBX | FTCOX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.46 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.46 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.130 | 14.996 | 21% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 998M | 24B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.39 | 9.00 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.18 | 46.21 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.78 | 29.04 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.91 | 83.34 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement