Ad is loading...
FTCWX vs FTDWX
FTCWX vs FTDWX Comparison
Open Charts FTCWX vs FTDWX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% C
Price$13.39
Change+$0.08 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.41B
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% M
Price$13.50
Change+$0.08 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.41B
FTCWX vs FTDWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTCWX vs. FTDWX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTCWX is a Buy and FTDWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTCWX (5.41B) and FTDWX (5.41B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FTDWX pays higher dividends than FTCWX: FTDWX (2.80) vs FTCWX (2.31). FTCWX was incepted earlier than FTDWX: FTCWX (19 years) vs FTDWX (19 years). FTCWX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FTDWX (1.02). FTCWX (28.00) and FTDWX (28.00) have comparable annual turnover. FTCWX (0) and FTDWX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTCWX (500) and FTDWX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FTDWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.84 vs. FTCWX (4.35). FTDWX return over 5 years is better than : 11.62 vs. FTCWX (8.80).
| FTCWX | FTDWX | FTCWX / FTDWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.02 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.02 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.206 | -0.095 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 5.41B | 5.41B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.31 | 2.80 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.35 | 4.84 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.56 | 5.19 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.80 | 11.62 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.17 | 14.79 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...