Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTDHX vs MBXFX
FTDHX vs MBXFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXFX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. FTDHX (1.8B). FTDHX pays higher dividends than MBXFX: FTDHX (1.32) vs MBXFX (1.11). FTDHX was incepted earlier than MBXFX: FTDHX (5 years) vs MBXFX (5 years). MBXFX (3.03) is less costly to investors than FTDHX (0.44). MBXFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTDHX: MBXFX (2500) vs FTDHX (1000000). FTDHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.08 vs. MBXFX (-0.64).
| FTDHX | MBXFX | FTDHX / MBXFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 3.03 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 3.03 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.144 | 0.538 | 2,816% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 8.19B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.11 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.08 | -0.64 | -2,042% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.49 | 8.07 | 688% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 38.36 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement